Case 088Fund economics and LP mathsHard
Build the model for Lakshvik Seed Fund I: Rs 400 crore, 2% fees for ten years, Rs 3 crore initial cheques for 12%, half of investable capital reserved for follow-ons, 40% dilution on initial stakes. How many companies does it back, and what total exit value must the portfolio produce for 3x net after 20% carry?
1The situation
Lakshvik Seed Fund I is raising Rs 400 crore from limited partners (LPs). The manager charges a 2% management fee on committed capital every year for ten years and takes 20% carried interest on profits once LPs have their capital back. For this case, ignore any hurdle rate and assume fees are not recycled.
The strategy: write Rs 3 crore first cheques for 12% of seed-stage companies, and hold back half of the capital left after fees as reserves to follow on in the companies that do well. Later rounds are expected to dilute each initial 12% stake by 40% before exit. An LP asks what the portfolio has to achieve for the fund to return 3x net of fees and carry.
2Your task
How many companies does the fund back, and what combined exit value must those companies reach for LPs to get 3x net?
Quick check
How much must the fund distribute in total for LPs to receive 3x net?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Lakshvik backs 53 companies and needs Rs 1,400 crore of distributions, which means roughly Rs 14,972 crore of combined exit value. Fees take Rs 80 crore; half of the Rs 320 crore left buys 53 stakes at Rs 3 crore. Carry adds Rs 200 crore to the Rs 1,200 crore LPs need. If reserves return 2x, the initial stakes must deliver Rs 1,078 crore at 7.2% ownership each.
Step 1Where does the Rs 400 crore actually go?
If you pool money with friends to buy a share of several restaurants, and pay a manager to pick them, you know the manager's salary comes out of the pot before any restaurant is bought. A fund is the same: 2% a year for ten years is Rs 80 crore of fees, which leaves Rs 320 crore to invest, and half of that is held back for follow-ons. Rs 160 crore for first cheques at Rs 3 crore each is 53 companies with Rs 1 crore left over, which joins the reserves at Rs 161 crore.
Step 2How much must the fund distribute for 3x net?
3x net on Rs 400 crore is Rs 1,200 crore to LPs. Carry is 20% of the profit above the Rs 400 crore LPs get back first. If the fund distributes D, LPs keep D minus 20% of (D minus 400), and setting that to 1,200 gives D of Rs 1,400 crore, with Rs 200 crore of carry. Against the Rs 320 crore actually invested, that is a gross multiple of 4.38x. Fees and carry together open a gap of more than a full turn between what the portfolio earns and what LPs receive.
| D | total distributions from the fund, Rs crore |
| 0.20 (D - 400) | carry: 20% of profit above committed capital |
| 1,200 | 3x net to LPs on Rs 400 crore |
Step 3What exit value does that require from the companies?
Reserves go into later rounds at higher prices, so they usually earn a lower multiple than first cheques. Assume reserves return 2x, Rs 322 crore; the initial stakes must then produce Rs 1,078 crore. Each initial 12% is diluted by 40% to 7.2% at exit, so the companies must reach about Rs 1,078 crore divided by 7.2%, Rs 14,972 crore of combined exit value. Spread evenly that is about Rs 282 crore per company, but seed returns are never even.
| Step | Rs crore |
|---|---|
| Committed capital | 400 |
| Fees, 2% for 10 years | 80 |
| Initial cheques, 53 x Rs 3 crore | 159 |
| Reserves | 161 |
| LPs' 3x net | 1,200 |
| Carry, 20% of profit | 200 |
| Gross distributions needed | 1,400 |
| From reserves at 2x | 322 |
| From initial stakes | 1,078 |
| Combined exit value at 7.2% ownership | 14,972 |
Step 4What does the model tell an LP about the strategy?
The number that matters is the fund returner. A single company returns the whole Rs 400 crore fund only if it exits at Rs 5,556 crore, because the fund owns 7.2% of it by then. For 3x net, Lakshvik realistically needs one outcome around Rs 7,500 crore plus a handful at Rs 1,000 to 2,000 crore. With 53 companies at seed, that is a reasonable number of shots, but the 12% entry ownership is the lever: at 8% the required exit value would rise by half. The model's limits are its assumptions: the 2x on reserves, a flat 40% dilution, no hurdle and no fee step-down after the investment period. An LP should ask to see each one flexed.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates gross up Rs 1,200 crore by 20% and say Rs 1,500 crore. Carry is charged on profit above committed capital, not on the whole distribution, so the right figure is Rs 1,400 crore.
The second miss is dividing by 12% instead of 7.2%. Entry ownership is not exit ownership; ignoring the 40% dilution understates the exit value the portfolio needs by two-fifths.
What the interviewer asks next
- Fees step down to 1% after year five. How many more companies can the fund back?
- The fund adds an 8% hurdle with full catch-up. Does the required distribution change at 3x?
- What if reserves return only 1x? How does the required exit value move?
- Would you rather write 40 cheques at 15% or 60 at 10%? Why?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
