Equity Research interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

72

Firms

45

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsMorningstar12Man Group6Balyasny Asset Management5BLBlackRock5FTFranklin Templeton5MSCI5Jefferies4CSCredit Suisse3Fidelity Investments3Moody's3Perella Weinberg Partners3Point723S&P Global3The Vanguard Group3WMWellington Management3Advent International2Apollo Global Management2Bank of America2Carlyle Group2DED.E. Shaw2Houlihan Lokey2HSBC2Piper Sandler2Sequoia Capital2SSState Street2Viking Global Investors2WBWilliam Blair2ACAQR Capital Management1BGBaupost Group1BMBNY Mellon1Centerview Partners1Coatue Management1Goldman Sachs1GSGuggenheim Securities1HWHarris Williams1Insight Partners1Invesco1Mizuho1Moelis & Company1MSMorgan Stanley1PIMCO1SCSchroders1Scotiabank1T. Rowe Price1TSTruist Securities1

Topic

All topicsResearch process9Stock pitch6Company analysis8Investment philosophy5Valuation14Modelling2Portfolio and risk8Macro8Sector knowledge2Accounting8Career and fit12Industry knowledge6Quantitative research1Sector: technology3Sector: consumer1Sector: healthcare1Sector: energy1Sector: financials2Sector: industrials1Case and estimation2

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseFitBrainteaserMarket view

1. 003Analyse whether Boeing is a good stock to invest in. Give me a two-line thesis on the spot.Stock pitchHardsuperdaySCSchrodersEquity Research · New York · 2025

   Say this

   Two lines means one claim and one reason. Something like: Boeing is a duopoly with a decade-long order backlog, so the question is not demand but whether it can execute delivery and repair its balance sheet; I would own it only if you believe free cash flow inflects within two years.

   Then walk it

   1. Line one is the structural fact that makes it investable: a global duopoly with Airbus, enormous switching costs for airlines, and a multi-year backlog that effectively pre-sells the output.
   2. Line two is the controversy, which is where the money is made or lost: production quality, regulatory constraint on output rates, and a balance sheet carrying heavy debt from the crisis years.
   3. So the thesis reduces to a single variable: deliveries per month. Revenue, cash flow and deleveraging all follow from that one number, which is unusual and worth saying because it makes the stock tractable.
   4. Then take a side. If you believe the rate ramps, free cash flow inflects sharply and the equity re-rates off depressed earnings. If you do not, the debt is a problem and you stay away.
   5. Then name the falsifier: monthly delivery data and the regulator's production cap are published, so the thesis is testable in near real time. That is what makes it a good pitch rather than an opinion.

   Where candidates lose it

   Reciting everything you know about Boeing. Two lines means two lines. The skill being tested is compression: finding the one variable the investment turns on and committing to a view on it.

   Expect next

   • What would change your mind?
   • How would you track the thesis?
   • Would you rather own Boeing or Airbus?

   Reported by candidates at Schroders (Equity Research, New York, 2025). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

2. 004Pitch me a stock.Stock pitchIntermediateevery roundMan GroupEquity Hedge · London · 2016MSMorgan StanleySales and Trading · Tokyo · 2025Balyasny Asset ManagementGeneralist · New York · 2020

   Say this

   Recommendation and target first, business in two sentences, then the variant view, the catalyst, the risk, and what would make you wrong. Ninety seconds, and the variant view is the only part that counts.

   Then walk it

   1. Open with the trade: 'Long X at 40, target 55, about 35 percent upside over 12 to 18 months.' Never build up to the recommendation.
   2. Two sentences on what the business actually does, so the interviewer knows you are not pitching a ticker.
   3. The variant view: what do you believe that consensus does not, and why are you right? 'The street models 8 percent growth; I think it is 14 because the new contract has not been added to numbers yet.' Quantify the gap.
   4. The catalyst and timing: what makes the market agree with you, and roughly when. A view with no catalyst is a value trap.
   5. Valuation: what multiple you are paying, what the peers trade at, what the reverse DCF implies.
   6. Risks and the falsifier: the two things that break the thesis, and the specific data point you would watch. Ending on what would make you wrong is what makes an analyst sound honest rather than promotional.

   Where candidates lose it

   Pitching a household mega-cap with a thesis lifted from the financial press. If the reason is in the newspaper, it is in the price. Pick something slightly off the beaten path and know its numbers cold.

   Expect next

   • Are you sure that thesis can be backed up? What if their costs do not fall?
   • What is the bear case?
   • How would you hedge it?

   Reported by candidates at Man Group (Equity Hedge, London, 2016); Morgan Stanley (Sales and Trading, Tokyo, 2025); Balyasny Asset Management (Generalist, New York, 2020). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

3. 005Are you sure your thesis can be backed up? What if their costs do not fall?Stock pitchHardsuperdayApollo Global ManagementInvestments · Remote · 2021FTFranklin TempletonOil and Gas · San Mateo · 2024

   Say this

   Answer the substance, do not defend the position. Say what evidence supports the cost assumption, quantify what happens if you are wrong, and state at what point you would exit.

   Then walk it

   1. First, give the evidence behind the assumption, specifically. 'Management guided to it' is weak. 'The input contract repriced in Q2 and the run-rate is already visible in the last two quarters of gross margin' is strong.
   2. Then quantify the downside. 'If costs stay flat, EPS is 15 percent below my number and the stock is worth 38 rather than 55, so I lose about 5 percent from here.' That shows you have modelled the bear case, not just the bull.
   3. Then the asymmetry: if the downside is 5 percent and the upside is 35, the position still makes sense even at a 50 percent probability. That is the real defence.
   4. Then the monitoring point: which disclosure tells you early that you are wrong, and by when you would expect to see it.
   5. And be willing to concede. 'You are right that this is the weakest part of the thesis, which is why I would size it at half a normal position' is a far better answer than digging in. Interviewers push to see whether you update on evidence.

   Where candidates lose it

   Defending the pitch emotionally. This is a pressure test of intellectual honesty, not of conviction. The winning response quantifies the downside and names the exit; stubbornness reads as someone who will lose the fund money.

   Expect next

   • At what price would you stop out?
   • How would you size the position?
   • What is the single data point you would watch?

   Reported by candidates at Apollo Global Management (Investments, Remote, 2021); Franklin Templeton (Oil and Gas, San Mateo, 2024). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

4. 006What areas of competitive advantage does this company have? Does it have barriers to entry, and can it sustain its revenue growth?Company analysisIntermediatecase studyMorningstarEquity Research · Chicago · 2023

   Say this

   Test the moat against the numbers rather than asserting it. A real competitive advantage shows up as returns on invested capital above the cost of capital, sustained for years, with stable or rising market share.

   Then walk it

   1. Name the source, and be specific. Intangibles like brand and patents, switching costs, network effects, cost advantage from scale or process, and efficient scale in a market too small for two players. Those five cover almost everything.
   2. Then prove it with evidence: ROIC consistently above WACC, gross margin stable through a downturn, pricing taken above inflation without volume loss, and customer retention.
   3. Then test durability directly. Ask what a well-funded competitor would have to do to take a customer, and how long it would take. If the answer is 'offer a lower price', there is no moat.
   4. On sustaining growth, separate the sources: price, volume, mix, new products, new geographies, and acquisitions. Growth from price and mix is high quality; growth from acquisitions is bought and should be valued differently.
   5. Then the honest test for a research note: is the moat widening, stable or narrowing? Morningstar's own framework is built on exactly that trend judgement, and it drives the fair value estimate far more than this year's earnings.

   Where candidates lose it

   Listing Porter's five forces as a memorised frame with no company-specific evidence. The grader wants the link from the qualitative claim to a number in the financials. No ROIC, no moat.

   Expect next

   • Is the moat widening or narrowing?
   • What return on capital does it earn against its cost of capital?
   • Would you rather own a low quality business at a great price or a high quality one at an okay price?

   Reported by candidates at Morningstar (Equity Research, Chicago, 2023). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

5. 009Why did you take a variant view on the multiple you applied to that company, relative to street expectations?ValuationHardsuperdayFTFranklin TempletonOil and Gas · San Mateo · 2024

   Say this

   Because the multiple should reflect the durability and the capital intensity of the earnings, and I think the market is applying a mid-cycle multiple to earnings that are not mid-cycle. Say what the street assumes, then why that assumption is wrong.

   Then walk it

   1. First, state the street's implied assumption in numbers. 'Consensus applies 6 times to a refiner on peak crack spreads, which implies they believe those spreads persist.'
   2. Then your disagreement and its basis. 'I apply 4.5 times because I think those spreads normalise within 18 months as capacity comes back, so I am valuing normalised rather than trailing earnings.'
   3. For a cyclical this is the whole game: the multiple and the earnings must be consistent. A low multiple on peak earnings is a value trap; a high multiple on trough earnings is often the correct entry.
   4. Support it with something observable: capacity additions, inventory levels, forward curve, historical spread ranges. The evidence has to be external to your own model.
   5. Then the discipline point: I would show the valuation across the cycle rather than a point estimate, and say what spread assumption is embedded in today's price. Reverse-engineering the market's assumption is the most persuasive thing in a research note.

   Where candidates lose it

   Justifying a multiple by peer comparison alone. That is circular. The multiple has to be defended by the economics, and for cyclicals specifically by where in the cycle the earnings sit.

   Expect next

   • What earnings are you applying that multiple to?
   • How do you normalise a cyclical?
   • What is priced in today?

   Reported by candidates at Franklin Templeton (Oil and Gas, San Mateo, 2024). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

6. 013How does a falling oil price affect oil-exporting nations?MacroIntermediatetechnicalSSState StreetEquity Research · Boston · 2020

   Say this

   It hits the fiscal balance, the current account and the currency simultaneously. Export revenue falls, the budget goes into deficit because most producers need a high fiscal breakeven price, and the currency comes under pressure.

   Then walk it

   1. Export revenue is the first channel. For a country where hydrocarbons are most of exports, a halving of the price halves the external income.
   2. The fiscal channel is the sharper one. Most producers have a fiscal breakeven oil price, often far above the marginal cost of production, because the budget funds subsidies and public employment. Below it, the deficit widens fast.
   3. Currency pressure follows. A floating currency depreciates, which cushions the local-currency revenue but imports inflation. A pegged currency instead burns reserves to defend the peg, which is why pegged producers face the harder adjustment.
   4. Second-round effects: sovereign wealth funds sell assets to fund the deficit, capital expenditure on projects is cut, and the non-oil economy contracts because it is largely funded by oil receipts.
   5. The differentiator between countries is buffers. A producer with a large sovereign fund and low breakeven can absorb years of weak prices. One with high breakeven and thin reserves faces a currency or a debt crisis. That comparison is the actual analysis.

   Where candidates lose it

   Stopping at 'they earn less money'. The examinable content is the fiscal breakeven concept and the difference between a floating and a pegged currency response. Name both and the answer is complete.

   Expect next

   • Which producers are most vulnerable?
   • What happens to their sovereign wealth funds?
   • How would you position for it in equities?

   Reported by candidates at State Street (Equity Research, Boston, 2020). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

7. 015Compare the sectors you have covered and tell me which has the best prospects.Sector knowledgeIntermediatetechnicalWMWellington ManagementGeneralist · Hong Kong · 2022

   Say this

   Compare them on a consistent frame rather than describing each in turn: structural growth, industry structure and pricing power, capital intensity, and where valuation sits relative to history. Then pick one and commit.

   Then walk it

   1. Set the frame first so the comparison is disciplined. Four axes: demand growth, competitive structure, returns on capital, and starting valuation.
   2. Score each sector briefly on each axis. This takes thirty seconds and it immediately sounds like a portfolio conversation rather than a summary.
   3. Then pick, and make the reason relative rather than absolute. 'Both are good businesses, but one is priced for the improvement and the other is not' is the analytically interesting answer.
   4. Distinguish structural from cyclical prospects. A sector with mediocre long-term economics can be the better investment today if it is at the bottom of its cycle and the market is extrapolating the trough.
   5. Close with the risk to your choice, and what would make you switch. Naming the condition under which you would change your mind is what separates a view from a preference.

   Where candidates lose it

   Describing each sector sequentially without comparing on a common axis. The question is a ranking exercise. Set the criteria first, then apply them, then choose.

   Expect next

   • What is priced into each?
   • Which would you avoid entirely?
   • How would that change in a recession?

   Reported by candidates at Wellington Management (Generalist, Hong Kong, 2022). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

8. 027How would you evaluate an LP stake in a fund, and how much would you pay for it?ValuationHardsuperdayBGBaupost GroupEquity Hedge · Boston · 2018

   Say this

   Start from reported NAV, then adjust it. You are buying the underlying assets plus the unfunded commitment and minus the fees, so the price is NAV adjusted for your own view of the marks, liquidity and remaining fee drag.

   Then walk it

   1. Reported NAV is the starting point, not the answer. Look through to the underlying positions and form your own view on the marks, especially anything illiquid or level three.
   2. Adjust for the fee drag on the remaining life: management fees on committed capital plus carry on future gains. That can be several percent of value in a fund with years left.
   3. For a closed-end structure, factor the unfunded commitment. You are buying an obligation to put in more money, and that has a cost and a risk.
   4. Then discount for illiquidity and for information asymmetry. The seller knows more than you, and there is a reason they are selling. Secondaries typically transact at a discount to NAV for exactly this reason, though quality assets can clear at or above.
   5. Then the vintage and the J-curve position. A fund three years in with assets marked at cost is a very different proposition from one seven years in with a clear path to exit.
   6. So my answer would be a percentage of NAV with the adjustments itemised, and I would say which adjustment I am least confident about.

   Where candidates lose it

   Answering 'NAV'. If it were NAV there would be no question. The expected content is the fee drag, the unfunded commitment, the illiquidity discount and adverse selection. Name the seller's information advantage explicitly.

   Expect next

   • Why is the seller selling?
   • How would you diligence the marks?
   • What discount to NAV would you want?

   Reported by candidates at Baupost Group (Equity Hedge, Boston, 2018). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

9. 028How would you perform a whitespace analysis?Company analysisHardtechnicalViking Global InvestorsQuantitative Research · New York · 2024

   Say this

   Map what the company currently sells to whom, map the total set of customers and products it could serve, and the gap between them is the whitespace. Then test whether the company can actually reach it.

   Then walk it

   1. Build the current position first: revenue split by product, by customer segment, by geography. You need the base to measure the gap from.
   2. Then size the addressable set honestly, bottom-up. Number of potential customers times realistic spend per customer, not a top-down market report number that includes everyone.
   3. The whitespace is the difference: customers in the addressable set who do not buy, and products the existing customers buy from someone else. The second is usually the higher-probability opportunity, because the relationship already exists.
   4. Then the feasibility test, which is where most whitespace analyses fail. Does the company have the product, the sales capacity and the right to win? Whitespace that requires capability it does not have is not an opportunity, it is a wish.
   5. Then quantify what the market is paying for. If the current price implies the company captures a third of the whitespace, and your work says it captures a tenth, you have a short. That conversion from market map to expectation is the actual investment output.

   Where candidates lose it

   Producing a large total addressable market number and calling it whitespace. The analytical value is entirely in the feasibility filter and in converting the result into what is priced in.

   Expect next

   • How do you size a market bottom-up?
   • How much of that is in the price?
   • How would you verify penetration rates?

   Reported by candidates at Viking Global Investors (Quantitative Research, New York, 2024). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

10. 039How would you analyse a retailer?Sector: consumerIntermediatetechnicalBank of AmericaConsumer and Retail · London · 2026

    Say this

    Same-store sales and gross margin drive everything. Decompose comps into traffic, basket size and price, then check whether margin is being bought with discounting, and watch inventory as the early warning.

    Then walk it

    1. Revenue splits into comparable store sales and square footage growth. Comps are the quality signal; new stores can mask a deteriorating base.
    2. Decompose comps further into transactions and average ticket, and ticket into units and price. A comp driven by price in an inflationary period is weaker than one driven by traffic.
    3. Gross margin is where the truth sits. Rising sales with falling gross margin means discounting, which is buying revenue rather than earning it.
    4. Inventory is the leading indicator. If inventory grows faster than sales for two quarters, markdowns are coming and the margin will follow. This is the single most reliable early signal in retail.
    5. Then the cost structure: occupancy and labour are largely fixed, so retail has high operating leverage. A two-point comp swing moves EBIT far more than it moves revenue.
    6. Then the structural questions: online mix and its margin, private label penetration, and whether the store estate is an asset or a liability. And check the lease liabilities, because a retailer's real leverage is usually in the leases.

    Where candidates lose it

    Focusing on revenue growth without decomposing comps, and ignoring inventory. Inventory-to-sales is the metric that separates people who have covered retail from people who have read about it.

    Expect next

    • What does rising inventory tell you?
    • How do you treat lease liabilities?
    • How would you value it against an online-only peer?

    Reported by candidates at Bank of America (Consumer and Retail, London, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.