Equity Research interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

72

Firms

45

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsMorningstar12Man Group6Balyasny Asset Management5BLBlackRock5FTFranklin Templeton5MSCI5Jefferies4CSCredit Suisse3Fidelity Investments3Moody's3Perella Weinberg Partners3Point723S&P Global3The Vanguard Group3WMWellington Management3Advent International2Apollo Global Management2Bank of America2Carlyle Group2DED.E. Shaw2Houlihan Lokey2HSBC2Piper Sandler2Sequoia Capital2SSState Street2Viking Global Investors2WBWilliam Blair2ACAQR Capital Management1BGBaupost Group1BMBNY Mellon1Centerview Partners1Coatue Management1Goldman Sachs1GSGuggenheim Securities1HWHarris Williams1Insight Partners1Invesco1Mizuho1Moelis & Company1MSMorgan Stanley1PIMCO1SCSchroders1Scotiabank1T. Rowe Price1TSTruist Securities1

Topic

All topicsResearch process9Stock pitch6Company analysis8Investment philosophy5Valuation14Modelling2Portfolio and risk8Macro8Sector knowledge2Accounting8Career and fit12Industry knowledge6Quantitative research1Sector: technology3Sector: consumer1Sector: healthcare1Sector: energy1Sector: financials2Sector: industrials1Case and estimation2

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseFitBrainteaserMarket view

1. 001How would you analyse a stock?Research processCorephone / first roundJefferiesEquity Research · New York · 2026

   Say this

   Business first, then numbers, then price. Understand how the company makes money and whether that is durable, build a model of what it earns, then decide whether the current price already reflects it.

   Then walk it

   1. Start with the business: what it sells, to whom, what share of revenue comes from where, and who it competes with. You cannot forecast what you cannot describe.
   2. Then the economics: unit economics, gross margin, operating leverage, return on invested capital, and where the cash actually goes.
   3. Then the durability question: what stops a competitor doing this? Switching costs, scale, network effects, regulation, brand. That determines whether today's margin survives.
   4. Then the model: forecast revenue by driver rather than by growth rate, build margin off the cost structure, and get to earnings and free cash flow.
   5. Then valuation and, critically, expectations. The key move in research is not 'what is it worth' but 'what is priced in'. I would reverse-engineer the current price into implied growth and margin, then ask whether I believe those numbers.
   6. The output is a rating, a target, and a variant view. Without a variant view there is no reason for anyone to read the note.

   Where candidates lose it

   Describing a valuation process rather than a research process. Anyone can build a DCF. The job is forming a differentiated view against consensus, so the expectations step has to appear in your answer.

   Expect next

   • What moves a stock?
   • What is your variant view on that name?
   • How do you know what is priced in?

   Reported by candidates at Jefferies (Equity Research, New York, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

2. 002What moves a stock?Research processIntermediatetechnicalBalyasny Asset ManagementEquity Hedge · Chicago · 2021

   Say this

   Changes in expectations, not the level of results. A stock moves when the market revises its forecast of future earnings, or revises the multiple it will pay for them. Everything else is noise around those two.

   Then walk it

   1. Price equals earnings times multiple. So there are exactly two levers, and every catalyst works through one of them.
   2. Earnings revisions are the bigger driver over any meaningful horizon. That is why the sell-side obsesses over guidance and why a beat with a cut to guidance sells off.
   3. Multiple changes come from the rate environment, from perceived risk, and from a change in the durability of growth. A company that convinces the market its growth is recurring rather than cyclical gets re-rated without changing a single forecast.
   4. In the short run, positioning and flows matter enormously. A crowded long with everyone already in it can fall on good news because there is nobody left to buy.
   5. So the practical question for a research analyst is never 'are results good' but 'are results better than what is discounted'. That is why the expectations framework is the job.

   Where candidates lose it

   Answering 'earnings' and stopping. That misses the multiple entirely, and it misses the central insight that it is the delta versus expectations that matters, not the absolute result.

   Expect next

   • How do you think about valuation drivers?
   • Why would a stock fall on a beat?
   • How do you measure what is priced in?

   Reported by candidates at Balyasny Asset Management (Equity Hedge, Chicago, 2021). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

3. 010How do you build a model that is detailed enough to be useful but simple enough that you can cover a lot of companies?ModellingHardtechnicalBalyasny Asset ManagementEquity Research · New York · 2026

   Say this

   Model deeply only where the variance is. For most companies two or three line items drive the outcome, so those get detailed driver builds and everything else gets a margin assumption or a percentage of sales.

   Then walk it

   1. Identify the swing factors first. For a retailer it is same-store sales and gross margin. For a bank it is net interest margin and provisions. For a software company it is net retention and sales efficiency. Model those properly.
   2. Everything else goes to ratios: other opex as a percent of revenue, working capital as days, tax at the guided rate. Precision there adds nothing and costs you maintenance time.
   3. Standardise the template across the coverage universe so the same row does the same thing in every file. That is what actually makes 15 names maintainable, because updating a quarter becomes mechanical.
   4. Build it around the disclosure you will actually receive. If the company only reports two segments, a five-segment model will be broken every quarter.
   5. And keep a one-page output: the drivers, the earnings bridge versus consensus, and the valuation. If the summary tab tells the story, the depth underneath can stay limited.
   6. The test I would apply: can I update this model in 20 minutes on results day? If not, it is too complex to cover 15 names with.

   Where candidates lose it

   Saying you would build the most detailed model possible. On the buy side, model complexity is a liability. The insight being tested is that modelling effort should be allocated to variance, not spread evenly.

   Expect next

   • How many names can one analyst realistically cover?
   • What goes on your summary tab?
   • How do you update on results day?

   Reported by candidates at Balyasny Asset Management (Equity Research, New York, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

4. 011How would you hedge a name that does not have a close public comparable?Portfolio and riskHardsuperdayBalyasny Asset ManagementEquity Research · New York · 2026

   Say this

   Hedge the exposures rather than the company. Decompose the position into its factor risks, market beta, sector, style, currency, commodity input, then hedge each with whatever liquid instrument matches it.

   Then walk it

   1. Start by decomposing: run the stock against factor returns and see what it is actually exposed to. Often a 'unique' business is really a bundle of common exposures.
   2. Hedge the market beta with an index future, sized on the regression beta rather than one.
   3. Hedge sector exposure with the closest sector ETF, accepting that the fit is imperfect. An imperfect hedge that removes 60 percent of the variance is better than no hedge.
   4. Hedge the specific input if there is one: a fuel-exposed business can be partly hedged with the commodity, a foreign earner with FX forwards.
   5. Then accept and size for the residual. The leftover idiosyncratic risk is the part you are actually being paid for, so the honest answer is that you hedge what you do not have a view on and hold what you do.
   6. And the practical constraint on a multi-manager platform: the risk system will impose factor limits anyway, so the hedge is often not optional. Saying that shows you understand how these seats actually operate.

   Where candidates lose it

   Reaching for a single 'closest competitor' short. If there were a close comp the question would not have been asked. The expected answer is factor decomposition, and naming the residual idiosyncratic risk as the intended exposure.

   Expect next

   • What residual risk are you left with?
   • How would you size the position?
   • What factor limits would you expect to operate under?

   Reported by candidates at Balyasny Asset Management (Equity Research, New York, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

5. 012What is the yield curve, what does it mean when it inverts, and why do people treat that as a recession indicator?MacroIntermediatetechnicalSSState StreetEquity Research · Boston · 2020

   Say this

   It plots government bond yields against maturity. Normally it slopes upward because investors demand more for lending longer. An inversion means short rates exceed long rates, which says the market expects the central bank to be cutting in future.

   Then walk it

   1. The normal upward slope comes from term premium and from expected growth and inflation.
   2. An inversion means the market expects policy rates to be lower in two years than today. Rates get cut when growth is weak, so an inversion is a forecast of weakness rather than a cause of it.
   3. The track record is why people watch it: in the US, a sustained 2s10s or 3m10y inversion has preceded every recession since the 1960s, usually by 12 to 18 months.
   4. There is also a causal channel, not just a signal. Banks borrow short and lend long, so an inverted curve compresses net interest margin and reduces the incentive to extend credit. Tighter credit slows the economy.
   5. The honest caveats: it has produced false positives, the lead time is long and variable, and quantitative easing distorted the term premium enough that the signal may be weaker than history suggests. An analyst who names that is more credible than one who treats it as a law.

   Where candidates lose it

   Describing the shape without explaining the mechanism, or treating the indicator as infallible. Both the expectations channel and the bank lending channel should appear, along with at least one reason to doubt it.

   Expect next

   • Which part of the curve do you watch?
   • How does an inversion affect bank earnings?
   • What is happening to the curve right now?

   Reported by candidates at State Street (Equity Research, Boston, 2020). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

6. 016Walk me through a DCF, and tell me when it is the wrong tool for a research analyst.ValuationIntermediatetechnicalJefferiesEquity Research · New York · 2026MorningstarEquity Research · Chicago · 2023

   Say this

   Forecast unlevered free cash flow, discount at WACC, add a terminal value, then bridge to equity value per share. It is the wrong tool when the terminal value dominates so completely that the answer is just your assumption restated.

   Then walk it

   1. The mechanics are the same as on the banking side: EBIT taxed, plus D&A, less CapEx, less working capital change, discounted at WACC, plus terminal value, less net debt, divided by diluted shares.
   2. Where research differs is the use. A sell-side target price is usually set on a multiple, with the DCF as a cross-check and a way to demonstrate what the market is implying.
   3. The most valuable version is the reverse DCF: hold the current price constant and solve for the growth and margin the market must be assuming. That turns valuation into a testable statement about expectations.
   4. It is the wrong tool for banks and insurers, where you use a dividend discount or residual income model because interest is revenue and free cash flow is not meaningful.
   5. It is also weak for early-stage or deeply cyclical companies, where near-term cash flows are negative or unrepresentative and 90 percent of the value sits in the terminal assumption.
   6. So the honest framing: a DCF is most useful not for the number it produces but for making explicit what you have to believe.

   Where candidates lose it

   Delivering the banking answer verbatim. On the research side the expected addition is the reverse DCF and the awareness that DCFs are rarely the primary target-setting method. Say both.

   Expect next

   • How would you value a bank then?
   • What does the reverse DCF tell you about this stock?
   • What discount rate do you use and why?

   Reported by candidates at Jefferies (Equity Research, New York, 2026); Morningstar (Equity Research, Chicago, 2023). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

7. 017How would you value a bank?ValuationHardtechnicalPerella Weinberg PartnersFinancial Institutions Group · New York · 2026Man GroupEquity Hedge · Boston · 2019

   Say this

   Price to tangible book against return on tangible equity, plus a dividend discount or residual income model. You do not use enterprise value or EBITDA, because for a bank debt is raw material and interest is revenue.

   Then walk it

   1. The core relationship: a bank should trade around book value if its return on equity equals its cost of equity, above book if it earns more, below if it earns less. The regression of price to book against ROTE across a peer group is the single most useful chart in the sector.
   2. Use tangible book, stripping goodwill and intangibles, because that is the capital actually supporting the balance sheet.
   3. For an intrinsic value, use a dividend discount model or residual income, since dividends are constrained by regulatory capital and that constraint is the real driver of distributable cash.
   4. The forecast drivers are net interest margin, loan growth, fee income, the cost-to-income ratio, and the provision charge. Provisions are where the cycle shows up and where forecasts go wrong.
   5. Capital is the binding constraint on everything. CET1 ratio against the regulatory requirement determines whether the bank can grow, buy back stock or must raise equity, so I would model capital explicitly rather than treating it as an output.
   6. And the thing that actually breaks bank valuations: credit losses are non-linear. A small deterioration in the macro can wipe out several years of earnings, which is why banks trade below book in a downturn regardless of reported profit.

   Where candidates lose it

   Applying EV/EBITDA or a standard unlevered DCF. It is meaningless for a bank and it is an instant fail in a financials interview. Lead with price to tangible book versus ROTE and the reason enterprise value does not apply.

   Expect next

   • Why can you not use enterprise value?
   • What happens to the valuation if rates fall 200 basis points?
   • How do you forecast provisions?

   Reported by candidates at Perella Weinberg Partners (Financial Institutions Group, New York, 2026); Man Group (Equity Hedge, Boston, 2019). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

8. 018What is the effect on the three statements of selling an asset?AccountingIntermediatetechnicalJefferiesEquity Research · New York · 2026

   Say this

   Depends on the sale price versus book value. Sell an asset with a book value of $100 for $120: you book a $20 gain, taxed; cash rises by the proceeds less the tax; and the asset leaves the balance sheet at its book value.

   Then walk it

   1. Income statement: a $20 gain. At 25 percent tax, net income rises $15.
   2. Cash flow: start at net income plus $15, reverse out the $20 non-cash gain in operating, then show the full $120 proceeds in investing. Net cash movement is $115, which is the proceeds less $5 of tax.
   3. Balance sheet: cash up $115, asset down $100, retained earnings up $15. It balances.
   4. For a research analyst the follow-through matters more than the mechanics: the gain is non-recurring, so it must be stripped out of the earnings base before you apply a multiple.
   5. And you lose the asset's future earnings, so the forecast has to come down. A company that beats on a disposal gain while its operating business shrinks is exactly the kind of thing a research note should call out.

   Where candidates lose it

   Getting the mechanics right and ignoring the analytical point. On the research side, the expected addition is that the gain is non-recurring and that forward earnings fall with the disposed asset.

   Expect next

   • How would you adjust your earnings base for it?
   • What if they sold it below book value?
   • How do you treat a company that regularly books disposal gains?

   Reported by candidates at Jefferies (Equity Research, New York, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

9. 019How do you assess earnings quality?AccountingHardtechnicalMoody'sCorporate Finance · New York · 2018MorningstarEquity Research · Chicago · 2023

   Say this

   Compare earnings to cash. If net income is consistently above cash from operations, something is being recognised that has not been collected. Then check the accruals, the adjustments and the one-offs.

   Then walk it

   1. The headline test: cash conversion. Cash from operations divided by net income, tracked over several years. Persistent divergence is the single best red flag available from published accounts.
   2. Then working capital. Receivable days rising faster than revenue means revenue is being pushed to customers or collection is deteriorating. Inventory days rising means a write-down is coming.
   3. Then the adjustments. Compare GAAP to the company's adjusted figures and see what is being excluded. Restructuring charges taken every year for five years are not one-off, they are operating costs in disguise.
   4. Then capitalisation choices: capitalised development costs, capitalised interest, and the depreciation life. Extending useful lives flatters earnings with no economic change.
   5. Then the tax rate and the below-the-line items, since a sudden drop in the effective tax rate can manufacture an EPS beat.
   6. For a note, the useful summary is a bridge from reported earnings to what I think the sustainable earnings power is, with each adjustment listed. That bridge is often the most valuable page in a research report.

   Where candidates lose it

   Listing ratios without the organising idea. The organising idea is that accounting earnings involve judgement and cash does not, so every test is a version of comparing the two. Say that first.

   Expect next

   • What is the single best red flag?
   • How do you treat stock-based compensation?
   • Walk me through a company you thought had poor earnings quality.

   Reported by candidates at Moody's (Corporate Finance, New York, 2018); Morningstar (Equity Research, Chicago, 2023). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

10. 020Should stock-based compensation be treated as a real expense?AccountingHardtechnicalTechnology coverageLong-only asset management

    Say this

    Yes. It is a genuine cost to existing shareholders even though no cash leaves the company, because it transfers ownership. Adding it back to get to adjusted EBITDA or free cash flow overstates what shareholders actually keep.

    Then walk it

    1. The economic argument: if the company paid those employees in cash and then issued shares to raise the same amount, nobody would argue the salary was not an expense. The two are identical in substance.
    2. It shows up as dilution. Share count creeps up every year, so per-share metrics deteriorate even when totals look fine. That is the cost, and it is real.
    3. Companies obscure it by buying back stock to offset dilution and then describing the buyback as capital return. It is not; it is paying cash for compensation already granted.
    4. The practical treatment I would use: expense it fully in the earnings I value, and if I want a cash-based measure, subtract the buyback needed to keep share count flat rather than adding SBC back.
    5. The counterargument worth acknowledging: the accounting charge is based on grant-date fair value, which can be a poor estimate of the eventual cost, and the expense is lumpy. So the number is imperfect even if the principle is clear.
    6. In practice this matters most in software, where SBC can be 15 to 25 percent of revenue. Whether you expense it decides whether a company is profitable at all.

    Where candidates lose it

    Accepting the company's adjusted figure because it is what consensus uses. Research is supposed to be the check on that. Have a view, and know roughly how large SBC is as a percentage of revenue for the sector you claim to follow.

    Expect next

    • How large is it as a percentage of revenue in software?
    • How do you handle it in a DCF?
    • What does that do to the sector's valuation?

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.