Case 048RestructuringHard
A property company offers to swap notes due in a year for fewer, longer, second lien notes, conditional on 90% taking it. Value the offer to a holder who exchanges and to one who holds out, and explain the holdout problem.
1The situation
Yamuk Realty has Rs 1,000 crore of unsecured notes due in twelve months, trading at 50. It cannot refinance them. Ahead of the notes sits Rs 300 crore of first lien bank debt, and the company's enterprise value is about Rs 800 crore.
Yamuk offers an exchange: for every Rs 100 of old notes, Rs 60 of new five-year second lien notes paying 12%. The offer is conditional on holders of at least 90% of the old notes tendering. Any notes not tendered stay outstanding on their original terms.
2Your task
Per Rs 100 of old notes, what does a holder get by exchanging and by holding out, in the cases where the exchange succeeds and fails, and why does the structure need a minimum condition?
Quick check
If 90% exchange and the company survives, what does a holder who kept the old notes receive in twelve months?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
If the exchange succeeds, an exchanger holds 60 of second lien notes worth about 60 if Yamuk survives and 55.6 in a liquidation, while a holdout is paid 100 at par in twelve months, about 89 today, and only loses in a liquidation. If it fails, everyone keeps old notes worth about 50. Holding out is never worse and usually better, so every holder wants to be the one who does not tender; the 90% condition and a covenant strip are how the company stops that.
Step 1What are the old notes worth if nothing happens?
Six friends lend to a shop that cannot repay all of them; if the shop is sold, whoever has security is paid first and the rest share what is left. Yamuk is worth Rs 800 crore; the first lien takes Rs 300 crore, leaving Rs 500 crore for Rs 1,000 crore of unsecured notes, a recovery of about 50 per 100, which is exactly where the notes trade. In twelve months the notes mature and cannot be refinanced, so without an exchange the likely outcome is a court process in which the unsecured holders receive that 50, less the costs and the time of the process. The company's offer of 60 of face in a longer, secured instrument is therefore more than the notes are worth today, which is why it can hope that holders say yes.
Step 2What does an exchanger hold after a successful exchange?
Trace the new stack. If 90% tender, Rs 540 crore of second lien notes are issued, Rs 100 crore of old notes remain, and total debt falls from Rs 1,300 crore to Rs 940 crore with only Rs 100 crore due in the next year. An exchanger's Rs 60 of second lienDebt secured on the same assets as the first lien lenders but ranking behind them; it is paid after the first lien in a liquidation and before unsecured creditors. notes earns Rs 7.2 a year and is worth about 60 if Yamuk can refinance in five years. In a liquidation today, Rs 500 crore covers 92.6% of the Rs 540 crore of second lien, a floor of 55.6 per 100 of old notes, above the 50 the notes were worth. The exchanger has traded 40 of face for security, a coupon and five years of time.
Step 3Why is the holdout better off, and what does that do to the offer?
Now stand in the holdout's shoes. After the exchange only Rs 100 crore of old notes matures next year, and a company worth Rs 800 crore with Rs 840 crore of long-dated secured debt can pay that, so the holdout receives 100 at par, worth about 89 today at 12%, against the exchanger's 60. The holdout's risk is a liquidation within the year, in which they sit behind Rs 840 crore of secured claims on Rs 800 crore of value and get nothing. But the exchange itself makes a liquidation less likely, because it removed the maturity wall. If the exchange fails, the holdout is no worse off than anyone else: everyone holds old notes worth about 50. So holding out weakly dominates exchanging, and if every holder reasons this way, nobody tenders and the exchange fails.
| Per 100 of old notes | Exchange succeeds, survives | Exchange succeeds, liquidation | Exchange fails |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exchange | 60 face, 7.2 coupon | 55.6 | 50 |
| Hold out | 100 at par in 12 months, about 89 today | 0 | 50 |
This is why the offer carries a minimum condition and usually a stick. The 90% threshold caps the free riders at Rs 100 crore, an amount the company can pay, so that exchangers are not funding a large holdout class; and an exit consent, in which tendering holders vote to strip the old notes of their covenants as they leave, makes the remaining old notes a worse instrument to hold. Other sticks: giving the new notes a lien that primes the old notes, or paying an early tender premium that only those who tender by a date receive. Without them, a holder's best response to an offer that is good for the group is to let the group take it and keep the old paper.
Close with a view. The exchange is worth doing for the group, because it turns a Rs 50 recovery in a court process into 60 of secured paper with a coupon, and the 90% condition is the price of making it work. A holder with a small position should exchange and accept being made whole only on 60, because the chance of being inside the 10% that gets par depends on everyone else behaving well. The limit: the Rs 800 crore value is an estimate, and if it is nearer Rs 600 crore the second lien is itself impaired, the exchange floor falls to 33.3, and the holdout's par payment becomes doubtful too.
Where candidates lose it
The common loss is valuing the holdout by lien rank: behind Rs 840 crore of secured debt on an Rs 800 crore company, so worth nothing. That is the liquidation case only. In the survival case the holdout is the first to mature and is paid in full, which is the whole problem.
The second is treating the 60-for-100 ratio as the loss. The notes trade at 50; 60 of secured, coupon-paying paper is a gain for the group, and the right comparison for each holder is against what the others do, not against par.
What the interviewer asks next
- If only 80% tender and the company waives the condition, what happens to the second lien cover and to the holdouts' chance of being paid?
- How does an exit consent work mechanically, and what is the minimum vote it needs under typical note terms?
- What would you change in the offer to make exchanging the dominant choice?
- Why might the first lien lenders object to the second lien being granted at all?
Asked at Houlihan Lokey, Restructuring, New York, 2025 (Wall Street Oasis): 1 intermediate technicals 4) Debt Exchange Model Exam 5) In-person final round
Company names and figures are illustrative.
