Fin Maverick
Foundations VocabularyAccounting & ReportingEconomics & MacroQuant Methods & ProgrammingBusiness & Company AnalysisCorporate Finance & ValuationBehavioural Finance
Banking & Market InfrastructureFixed Income & RatesDerivatives & Structured ProductsPublic EquitiesTransactions & DealsPortfolio ConstructionFunds & AMCs
Private Markets & AlternativesRisk, Treasury & ControlAI & Digital FinanceStochastic Calculus & PricingWealth & Personal FinanceIndian Markets & RegulationProfessional Practice
CalculatorComparison
Frameworks
Explore Bootcamps
Equity ResearchPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund MasteryInvestment Banking Analyst
Private Equity AnalystQuant & Hedge Fund AnalystBreaking Into VCFinancial Analyst Program
Risk Management ProgramPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsDerivatives Foundation
Explore Free Courses

Equity Research6

Writing an Investment ThesisBuilding a Discounted Cash FlowReading an Annual Report FastReading a Sector Before a CompanySpotting Quality of Earnings Red FlagsBuilding a Revenue Forecast From Drivers

Portfolio Management3

Rebalancing: When, Why and What It CostsStrategic and Tactical Asset AllocationMeasuring Risk in a Portfolio

Mutual Fund Mastery3

Comparing Funds Without Being FooledHow a NAV Is Struck and Which Day You GetReading a Fund Factsheet Properly

Derivatives Unlocked4

Hedging a Real ExposureThe Greeks, PracticallyFutures, the Basis and What Moves ItReading an Option Payoff

AI For Finance2

Retrieval and Grounding for FinanceDocument Extraction in Finance

Breaking Into Quants4

Backtesting a StrategyHypothesis TestingCleaning Financial DataRegression for Finance

Breaking Into VC3

Sizing a MarketReading a Term Sheet as a FounderHow a Venture Round Actually Works

Financial Analyst Program4

Common Size and Trend AnalysisReading a Cash Flow StatementRatio Analysis That Says SomethingBuilding a Working Capital Schedule

Risk Management Program2

Credit Exposure and How It Is ReducedValue at Risk and What It Hides

Investment Banking Analyst3

Precedent Transactions and Why They DifferReading a Term Sheet StructurallyBuilding a Comparable Companies Table

Private Wealth Management3

Tax Aware Portfolio DecisionsBuilding a Client Risk ProfileGoal Based Planning Arithmetic

Debt Capital Markets3

Analysing an Issuer's CreditDuration and What It Does Not Tell YouBond Pricing and Yield Mechanics

Private Equity Analyst2

Fund Waterfalls and CarryThe LBO in Structure

Hedge Funds Analyst2

Short Selling MechanicsLong Short Mechanics
QuarksCourses
Explore Interview Preparation
Investment BankingEquity ResearchVenture CapitalistPrivate EquityHedge Funds
QuantFinancial AnalysisPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsRisk Management
Derivatives FoundationPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund Mastery
PartnershipsShowdown
Log inSign up
Interview tracksAll
1Investment Banking
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
2Equity Research
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
3Venture Capital
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
4Private Equity
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
5Hedge Funds
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
6Quant
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
7Financial Analysis
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
8Private Wealth Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
9Debt Capital Markets
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
10Risk Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
11Derivatives Foundation
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
12Portfolio Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
13Mutual Fund Mastery
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
048

Case 048RestructuringHard

A property company offers to swap notes due in a year for fewer, longer, second lien notes, conditional on 90% taking it. Value the offer to a holder who exchanges and to one who holds out, and explain the holdout problem.

Houlihan LokeyNew York · 2025

1The situation

Yamuk Realty has Rs 1,000 crore of unsecured notes due in twelve months, trading at 50. It cannot refinance them. Ahead of the notes sits Rs 300 crore of first lien bank debt, and the company's enterprise value is about Rs 800 crore.

Yamuk offers an exchange: for every Rs 100 of old notes, Rs 60 of new five-year second lien notes paying 12%. The offer is conditional on holders of at least 90% of the old notes tendering. Any notes not tendered stay outstanding on their original terms.

2Your task

Per Rs 100 of old notes, what does a holder get by exchanging and by holding out, in the cases where the exchange succeeds and fails, and why does the structure need a minimum condition?

Quick check

If 90% exchange and the company survives, what does a holder who kept the old notes receive in twelve months?

Worked solution

Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.

30-second answerThe answer to give first

If the exchange succeeds, an exchanger holds 60 of second lien notes worth about 60 if Yamuk survives and 55.6 in a liquidation, while a holdout is paid 100 at par in twelve months, about 89 today, and only loses in a liquidation. If it fails, everyone keeps old notes worth about 50. Holding out is never worse and usually better, so every holder wants to be the one who does not tender; the 90% condition and a covenant strip are how the company stops that.

Step 1What are the old notes worth if nothing happens?

Six friends lend to a shop that cannot repay all of them; if the shop is sold, whoever has security is paid first and the rest share what is left. Yamuk is worth Rs 800 crore; the first lien takes Rs 300 crore, leaving Rs 500 crore for Rs 1,000 crore of unsecured notes, a recovery of about 50 per 100, which is exactly where the notes trade. In twelve months the notes mature and cannot be refinanced, so without an exchange the likely outcome is a court process in which the unsecured holders receive that 50, less the costs and the time of the process. The company's offer of 60 of face in a longer, secured instrument is therefore more than the notes are worth today, which is why it can hope that holders say yes.

Step 2What does an exchanger hold after a successful exchange?

Trace the new stack. If 90% tender, Rs 540 crore of second lien notes are issued, Rs 100 crore of old notes remain, and total debt falls from Rs 1,300 crore to Rs 940 crore with only Rs 100 crore due in the next year. An exchanger's Rs 60 of second lienDebt secured on the same assets as the first lien lenders but ranking behind them; it is paid after the first lien in a liquidation and before unsecured creditors. notes earns Rs 7.2 a year and is worth about 60 if Yamuk can refinance in five years. In a liquidation today, Rs 500 crore covers 92.6% of the Rs 540 crore of second lien, a floor of 55.6 per 100 of old notes, above the 50 the notes were worth. The exchanger has traded 40 of face for security, a coupon and five years of time.

Yamuk's capital stack before and after the exchange, against Rs 800 crore of value300First lien 3001,000Unsecured 1,000, due in 1 yearBefore300First lien 300540Second lien 540, 5 years100Holdouts 100, due in 1 yearAfter, 90% tenderValue Rs 800 crore: everythingabove this line is unpaidin a liquidationcovered: 500 of 1,000, 50%covered: 500 of 540, 93%under water, but first to mature
Before the exchange Rs 800 crore of value covers the first lien and half the unsecured notes; after a 90% exchange it covers the first lien and 93% of the Rs 540 crore of second lien, leaving the Rs 100 crore of holdouts under water in a liquidation but first to mature.
Step 3Why is the holdout better off, and what does that do to the offer?

Now stand in the holdout's shoes. After the exchange only Rs 100 crore of old notes matures next year, and a company worth Rs 800 crore with Rs 840 crore of long-dated secured debt can pay that, so the holdout receives 100 at par, worth about 89 today at 12%, against the exchanger's 60. The holdout's risk is a liquidation within the year, in which they sit behind Rs 840 crore of secured claims on Rs 800 crore of value and get nothing. But the exchange itself makes a liquidation less likely, because it removed the maturity wall. If the exchange fails, the holdout is no worse off than anyone else: everyone holds old notes worth about 50. So holding out weakly dominates exchanging, and if every holder reasons this way, nobody tenders and the exchange fails.

What each holder gets per 100 of old notes, by what they do and whether 90% tenderExchange succeeds (90% tender)Exchange failsYou exchangeYou hold out60 of second lien, 12%, 5 yearscoupon 7.2 a year; worth about 60if Yamuk refinances in five yearsliquidation floor: 92.6% of 60 = 55.6you gave up 40 of face to get paidNothing happens: old notes stay1,000 due in a year on an 800 companyunsecured share 500 of 800: about 50after first lien takes its 300the price the notes trade at today100 at par in twelve monthsabout 89 today at 12%; only 100 is duebecause the other 900 was pushed outliquidation: 0, behind 840 of securedbest outcome, if few others do itSame as the exchanger: old notesrecovery about 50 per 100holding out cost nothing hereso holding out never losesagainst exchangingWhatever the others do, a holder does at least as well by holding out: that is the holdout problem.
Per 100 of old notes, exchanging gives 60 of second lien notes if the exchange succeeds, while holding out gives 100 at par in a year if it succeeds and about 50 if it fails, the same as exchanging in that case, so holding out is never worse.
Per 100 of old notesExchange succeeds, survivesExchange succeeds, liquidationExchange fails
Exchange60 face, 7.2 coupon55.650
Hold out100 at par in 12 months, about 89 today050
A holder who holds out while 90% exchange collects 100 at par if Yamuk survives against 60 for an exchanger, and the same 50 as everyone if the exchange fails; only a liquidation within the year punishes the holdout.

This is why the offer carries a minimum condition and usually a stick. The 90% threshold caps the free riders at Rs 100 crore, an amount the company can pay, so that exchangers are not funding a large holdout class; and an exit consent, in which tendering holders vote to strip the old notes of their covenants as they leave, makes the remaining old notes a worse instrument to hold. Other sticks: giving the new notes a lien that primes the old notes, or paying an early tender premium that only those who tender by a date receive. Without them, a holder's best response to an offer that is good for the group is to let the group take it and keep the old paper.

Close with a view. The exchange is worth doing for the group, because it turns a Rs 50 recovery in a court process into 60 of secured paper with a coupon, and the 90% condition is the price of making it work. A holder with a small position should exchange and accept being made whole only on 60, because the chance of being inside the 10% that gets par depends on everyone else behaving well. The limit: the Rs 800 crore value is an estimate, and if it is nearer Rs 600 crore the second lien is itself impaired, the exchange floor falls to 33.3, and the holdout's par payment becomes doubtful too.

Where candidates lose it

The common loss is valuing the holdout by lien rank: behind Rs 840 crore of secured debt on an Rs 800 crore company, so worth nothing. That is the liquidation case only. In the survival case the holdout is the first to mature and is paid in full, which is the whole problem.

The second is treating the 60-for-100 ratio as the loss. The notes trade at 50; 60 of secured, coupon-paying paper is a gain for the group, and the right comparison for each holder is against what the others do, not against par.

What the interviewer asks next

  • If only 80% tender and the company waives the condition, what happens to the second lien cover and to the holdouts' chance of being paid?
  • How does an exit consent work mechanically, and what is the minimum vote it needs under typical note terms?
  • What would you change in the offer to make exchanging the dominant choice?
  • Why might the first lien lenders object to the second lien being granted at all?

Asked at Houlihan Lokey, Restructuring, New York, 2025 (Wall Street Oasis): 1 intermediate technicals 4) Debt Exchange Model Exam 5) In-person final round

← Case 047Case study presentation: four valuation methods give four different ranges for a hotel company. Build the football field and present a view on value.Case 049 →Build a coverage plan for a private equity sponsor: which of its holdings are likely exits in the next 18 months, what fee pool that implies, and where the buy-side opportunities are.

Company names and figures are illustrative.

Fin Maverick Free CoursesExplore Free Courses
Fin Maverick BootcampsExplore Bootcamps
Fin Maverick

Finance education that ends in a job, not a certificate that gathers dust. Built for young India.

LEARN
CalculatorsFrameworksComparisonsInterview RoadmapsShowdown
RESOURCES
All CoursesFree CoursesBootcampsInternships
COMPANY
AboutJob openingPartnership
LEGAL
Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsContent LicenseReturn & Refund Policy
© 2026 FIN MAVERICK / BUILT FOR INDIA.DO FINANCE, DO NOT JUST READ ABOUT IT.