Fin Maverick
Foundations VocabularyAccounting & ReportingEconomics & MacroQuant Methods & ProgrammingBusiness & Company AnalysisCorporate Finance & ValuationBehavioural Finance
Banking & Market InfrastructureFixed Income & RatesDerivatives & Structured ProductsPublic EquitiesTransactions & DealsPortfolio ConstructionFunds & AMCs
Private Markets & AlternativesRisk, Treasury & ControlAI & Digital FinanceStochastic Calculus & PricingWealth & Personal FinanceIndian Markets & RegulationProfessional Practice
CalculatorComparison
Frameworks
Explore Bootcamps
Equity ResearchPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund MasteryInvestment Banking Analyst
Private Equity AnalystQuant & Hedge Fund AnalystBreaking Into VCFinancial Analyst Program
Risk Management ProgramPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsDerivatives Foundation
Explore Free Courses

Equity Research6

Writing an Investment ThesisBuilding a Discounted Cash FlowReading an Annual Report FastReading a Sector Before a CompanySpotting Quality of Earnings Red FlagsBuilding a Revenue Forecast From Drivers

Portfolio Management3

Rebalancing: When, Why and What It CostsStrategic and Tactical Asset AllocationMeasuring Risk in a Portfolio

Mutual Fund Mastery3

Comparing Funds Without Being FooledHow a NAV Is Struck and Which Day You GetReading a Fund Factsheet Properly

Derivatives Unlocked4

Hedging a Real ExposureThe Greeks, PracticallyFutures, the Basis and What Moves ItReading an Option Payoff

AI For Finance2

Retrieval and Grounding for FinanceDocument Extraction in Finance

Breaking Into Quants4

Backtesting a StrategyHypothesis TestingCleaning Financial DataRegression for Finance

Breaking Into VC3

Sizing a MarketReading a Term Sheet as a FounderHow a Venture Round Actually Works

Financial Analyst Program4

Common Size and Trend AnalysisReading a Cash Flow StatementRatio Analysis That Says SomethingBuilding a Working Capital Schedule

Risk Management Program2

Credit Exposure and How It Is ReducedValue at Risk and What It Hides

Investment Banking Analyst3

Precedent Transactions and Why They DifferReading a Term Sheet StructurallyBuilding a Comparable Companies Table

Private Wealth Management3

Tax Aware Portfolio DecisionsBuilding a Client Risk ProfileGoal Based Planning Arithmetic

Debt Capital Markets3

Analysing an Issuer's CreditDuration and What It Does Not Tell YouBond Pricing and Yield Mechanics

Private Equity Analyst2

Fund Waterfalls and CarryThe LBO in Structure

Hedge Funds Analyst2

Short Selling MechanicsLong Short Mechanics
QuarksCourses
Explore Interview Preparation
Investment BankingEquity ResearchVenture CapitalistPrivate EquityHedge Funds
QuantFinancial AnalysisPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsRisk Management
Derivatives FoundationPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund Mastery
PartnershipsShowdown
Log inSign up
Interview tracksAll
1Investment Banking
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
2Equity Research
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
3Venture Capital
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
4Private Equity
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
5Hedge Funds
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
6Quant
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
7Financial Analysis
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
8Private Wealth Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
9Debt Capital Markets
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
10Risk Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
11Derivatives Foundation
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
12Portfolio Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
13Mutual Fund Mastery
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
052

Case 052Client mandates and IPSWarm up

A client's 70/30 portfolio has just lost ground after a 22% fall in equities, and he calls to sell everything. What are his weights now, what does his policy say to do, and what would selling lock in?

MSMorgan StanleyBoca Raton · 2026

1The situation

Kiran Mahadik, 46, a doctor with a steady income, holds Rs 180 lakh in a portfolio set up two years ago under a written policy: 70% equity funds and 30% debt funds, rebalanced back to target whenever either weight drifts more than 5 points. His goal is retirement at 60; he has no need to draw on the money for fourteen years.

Equities have just fallen 22% in three months. Debt has been flat. He calls on a Monday morning: he has read that markets could fall further and wants everything moved to a bank deposit today.

2Your task

Show his current weights and the trade the policy calls for, and explain what selling now would lock in. How do you handle the call?

Quick check

What does his written policy call for after the fall?

Worked solution

Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.

30-second answerThe answer to give first

Equity is now 64.5% of Rs 152.3 lakh, and his policy says buy about Rs 8.3 lakh of equity, not sell. His Rs 126 lakh of equity is worth Rs 98.3 lakh; debt is still Rs 54 lakh. Selling everything would turn a Rs 27.7 lakh paper fall into a realised one, and equity would need to rise 28.2% just to get back to where it was. Nothing about his goal or horizon has changed.

Step 1What are the weights after the fall?

Work in rupees first, then weights. Equity was Rs 126 lakh and is now Rs 126 lakh times 0.78, Rs 98.28 lakh. Debt is unchanged at Rs 54 lakh. The portfolio is Rs 152.28 lakh, and equity is 98.28 over 152.28, 64.5%, a drift of 5.5 points below target. Notice that equity fell 22% but the weight fell only 5.5 points, because the debt holding cushions the total. The portfolio is down 15.4%, not 22%, which is worth telling him in those words.

After a fall, the policy buys equity: the opposite of the phone callPolicy mixRs 180.0 lakhEquity 70.0%Debt 30.0%After the 22% fallRs 152.3 lakhEquity 64.5%Debt 35.5%After rebalancingRs 152.3 lakhEquity 70.0%Debt 30.0%policy 70%buy Rs 8.3 lakhRebalancing moves Rs 8.3 lakh from debt into equity at lower prices.Selling everything turns a Rs 27.7 lakh paper fall into a permanent one.
The fall takes Kiran Mahadik's equity from 70% to 64.5% of a Rs 152.3 lakh portfolio; his policy restores 70% by moving Rs 8.3 lakh from debt into equity, the opposite of the sale he is asking for.
Step 2What does the policy call for, and why?

The drift is more than 5 points, so the rule triggers. Target equity is 70% of Rs 152.28 lakh, Rs 106.60 lakh, so the trade moves Rs 8.32 lakh from debt funds into equity funds. A rebalancing rule is a decision taken calmly in advance so that it does not have to be taken in a panic: it buys what has fallen and sells what has held up. It is the same logic as a shop that restocks the shelves that emptied, rather than the ones that did not sell.

Next move in equitiesSell everything nowHold, no rebalanceRebalance to 70/30
Recovers 28.2% to the old level152.3180.0182.3
Falls another 10%152.3142.5141.6
Rs lakh, debt returns ignored. If equities recover to their old level, rebalancing ends at Rs 182.3 lakh against Rs 152.3 lakh for selling; if they fall another 10%, rebalancing costs Rs 0.8 lakh against simply holding.
Step 3What would selling lock in, and what is the honest limitation of rebalancing?

Selling realises the Rs 27.7 lakh fall. From there, getting back needs equity to rise 28.2%, and a client in a deposit cannot participate in that recovery unless he times his way back in, which people who sold in fear rarely do. Be honest about the other side too: if markets fall another 10%, the rebalanced portfolio ends Rs 0.8 lakh below simply holding, and Rs 10.7 lakh below selling. Rebalancing is not a forecast. It is a discipline that pays over many cycles because it buys cheaper and sells dearer on average, not in every episode.

Step 4How do you actually handle the call?

Listen first, then bring him back to his own plan. Ask what has changed: his job, his health, his need for money before 60. If nothing has, then the portfolio's purpose has not changed either. Show him the numbers in rupees: his portfolio is down 15.4%, not 22%, and the plan he signed calls for buying. If he still cannot sleep, a smaller step is better than a sale: rebalance halfway now and the rest in a month, or agree to review the policy's 70% in a calm week rather than today. If his circumstances have genuinely changed, change the policy, then the portfolio, in that order.

Where candidates lose it

Candidates either agree with the client to keep him happy or lecture him about staying invested. Both miss the interviewer's test: whether you can put the policy, the numbers and the client's actual situation in front of him, in rupees, calmly.

The arithmetic slip is saying the portfolio is down 22%. Only the equity is; with 30% in debt the total is down 15.4%, and that number is the one that calms the conversation.

What the interviewer asks next

  • What if Kiran had lost his job last month? How does that change your advice?
  • Should the rebalancing band be 5 points or 10 points, and why?
  • How would you rebalance if selling debt funds triggered tax?
  • What would you put in writing after the call?

Asked at Morgan Stanley, Investments, Boca Raton, 2026 (Wall Street Oasis): They had me perform an analysis on what I would do in certain situations - mostly client facing.

← Case 051A client needs Rs 20 lakh a year for the next five years. Using a zero-coupon yield curve, what does a bond ladder that meets the need cost today, and which risks does it remove?Case 053 →A stock in a Rs 2,000 crore flexi cap fund has rallied from 8% to 12% of the fund, above its 10% single-stock limit. How much must be sold to bring it to 9.5%, what does the sale cost, and what must the fund confirm about the rule?

Company names and figures are illustrative.

Fin Maverick Free CoursesExplore Free Courses
Fin Maverick BootcampsExplore Bootcamps
Fin Maverick

Finance education that ends in a job, not a certificate that gathers dust. Built for young India.

LEARN
CalculatorsFrameworksComparisonsInterview RoadmapsShowdown
RESOURCES
All CoursesFree CoursesBootcampsInternships
COMPANY
AboutJob openingPartnership
LEGAL
Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsContent LicenseReturn & Refund Policy
© 2026 FIN MAVERICK / BUILT FOR INDIA.DO FINANCE, DO NOT JUST READ ABOUT IT.