Case 052Client mandates and IPSWarm up
A client's 70/30 portfolio has just lost ground after a 22% fall in equities, and he calls to sell everything. What are his weights now, what does his policy say to do, and what would selling lock in?
1The situation
Kiran Mahadik, 46, a doctor with a steady income, holds Rs 180 lakh in a portfolio set up two years ago under a written policy: 70% equity funds and 30% debt funds, rebalanced back to target whenever either weight drifts more than 5 points. His goal is retirement at 60; he has no need to draw on the money for fourteen years.
Equities have just fallen 22% in three months. Debt has been flat. He calls on a Monday morning: he has read that markets could fall further and wants everything moved to a bank deposit today.
2Your task
Show his current weights and the trade the policy calls for, and explain what selling now would lock in. How do you handle the call?
Quick check
What does his written policy call for after the fall?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Equity is now 64.5% of Rs 152.3 lakh, and his policy says buy about Rs 8.3 lakh of equity, not sell. His Rs 126 lakh of equity is worth Rs 98.3 lakh; debt is still Rs 54 lakh. Selling everything would turn a Rs 27.7 lakh paper fall into a realised one, and equity would need to rise 28.2% just to get back to where it was. Nothing about his goal or horizon has changed.
Step 1What are the weights after the fall?
Work in rupees first, then weights. Equity was Rs 126 lakh and is now Rs 126 lakh times 0.78, Rs 98.28 lakh. Debt is unchanged at Rs 54 lakh. The portfolio is Rs 152.28 lakh, and equity is 98.28 over 152.28, 64.5%, a drift of 5.5 points below target. Notice that equity fell 22% but the weight fell only 5.5 points, because the debt holding cushions the total. The portfolio is down 15.4%, not 22%, which is worth telling him in those words.
Step 2What does the policy call for, and why?
The drift is more than 5 points, so the rule triggers. Target equity is 70% of Rs 152.28 lakh, Rs 106.60 lakh, so the trade moves Rs 8.32 lakh from debt funds into equity funds. A rebalancing rule is a decision taken calmly in advance so that it does not have to be taken in a panic: it buys what has fallen and sells what has held up. It is the same logic as a shop that restocks the shelves that emptied, rather than the ones that did not sell.
| Next move in equities | Sell everything now | Hold, no rebalance | Rebalance to 70/30 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recovers 28.2% to the old level | 152.3 | 180.0 | 182.3 |
| Falls another 10% | 152.3 | 142.5 | 141.6 |
Step 3What would selling lock in, and what is the honest limitation of rebalancing?
Selling realises the Rs 27.7 lakh fall. From there, getting back needs equity to rise 28.2%, and a client in a deposit cannot participate in that recovery unless he times his way back in, which people who sold in fear rarely do. Be honest about the other side too: if markets fall another 10%, the rebalanced portfolio ends Rs 0.8 lakh below simply holding, and Rs 10.7 lakh below selling. Rebalancing is not a forecast. It is a discipline that pays over many cycles because it buys cheaper and sells dearer on average, not in every episode.
Step 4How do you actually handle the call?
Listen first, then bring him back to his own plan. Ask what has changed: his job, his health, his need for money before 60. If nothing has, then the portfolio's purpose has not changed either. Show him the numbers in rupees: his portfolio is down 15.4%, not 22%, and the plan he signed calls for buying. If he still cannot sleep, a smaller step is better than a sale: rebalance halfway now and the rest in a month, or agree to review the policy's 70% in a calm week rather than today. If his circumstances have genuinely changed, change the policy, then the portfolio, in that order.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates either agree with the client to keep him happy or lecture him about staying invested. Both miss the interviewer's test: whether you can put the policy, the numbers and the client's actual situation in front of him, in rupees, calmly.
The arithmetic slip is saying the portfolio is down 22%. Only the equity is; with 30% in debt the total is down 15.4%, and that number is the one that calms the conversation.
What the interviewer asks next
- What if Kiran had lost his job last month? How does that change your advice?
- Should the rebalancing band be 5 points or 10 points, and why?
- How would you rebalance if selling debt funds triggered tax?
- What would you put in writing after the call?
Asked at Morgan Stanley, Investments, Boca Raton, 2026 (Wall Street Oasis): They had me perform an analysis on what I would do in certain situations - mostly client facing.
Company names and figures are illustrative.
