Private Equity interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

83

Firms

40

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsAdvent International6Apollo Global Management6Audax Group6Carlyle Group6EQT6Silver Lake6Vista Equity Partners6WPWarburg Pincus6HIH.I.G. Capital5Oaktree Capital Management5Platinum Equity5TPTPG5General Atlantic4AMAres Management3Blackstone3Clayton Dubilier and Rice3GSGuggenheim Securities3Insight Partners3Invesco3Lazard3Neuberger Berman3NUNuveen3TSTruist Securities3Bain Capital2HWHarris Williams2Kohlberg Kravis Roberts2Millennium Management2Moody's2Rothschild & Co2WBWilliam Blair2Bessemer Venture Partners1Citi1Evercore1FTFranklin Templeton1Houlihan Lokey1HPS Investment Partners1KKR1Mizuho1MSMorgan Stanley1Sycamore Partners1

Topic

All topicsLBO mechanics7Value creation5Returns2Fund economics9Investment judgement18Valuation6Firm knowledge2Credit and financing9Operations4Due diligence8Career and fit11Sector knowledge4Accounting2Deal structuring7Industry knowledge3Brainteasers3

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseFitMarket viewBrainteaser

1. 043How does depreciation flow through the three statements?AccountingCorefirst roundOaktree Capital ManagementDebt Capital Markets · New York · 2026Moody'sGeneralist · New York · 2022

   Say this

   Take $10 at a 25 percent tax rate. Pre-tax income falls $10, net income falls $7.50, but cash rises $2.50 because depreciation is non-cash and the only real effect is the tax saved.

   Then walk it

   1. Income statement: $10 of depreciation reduces EBIT by $10, so net income is down $7.50 after tax.
   2. Cash flow statement: start at minus $7.50, add back the $10 non-cash charge, so cash from operations rises $2.50.
   3. Balance sheet: cash up $2.50, net PP&E down $10, total assets down $7.50. Retained earnings down $7.50. It balances.
   4. The economic point is the depreciation tax shield: a non-cash charge that generates real cash by reducing tax.
   5. For a sponsor this matters at entry, because purchase accounting writes assets up, which creates additional depreciation and amortisation and therefore an additional tax shield. That step-up is worth real money and gets negotiated.
   6. And for a credit analyst the point is the opposite direction: depreciation approximates the capital the business must eventually respend, so EBITDA overstates the cash available to service debt by roughly the maintenance CapEx.

   Where candidates lose it

   Saying cash falls. It does not. And for a private equity or credit interview specifically, the expected addition is the link to the purchase accounting step-up or to maintenance CapEx. The bare mechanics alone read as a banking answer.

   Expect next

   • Now do $10 of CapEx.
   • How does the step-up in an asset deal change this?
   • Why is EBITDA a poor proxy for cash available to service debt?

   Reported by candidates at Oaktree Capital Management (Debt Capital Markets, New York, 2026); Moody's (Generalist, New York, 2022). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

2. 099Why did you leave, or why are you leaving, your current firm?Career and fitIntermediatefirst roundEQTInfrastructure · Munich · 2013Moody'sAnalytics · New York · 2018Millennium ManagementTechnology · London · 2024

   Say this

   Move toward something rather than away from something. Name what this role offers that your current one structurally cannot, and keep any criticism of your current employer minimal and factual.

   Then walk it

   1. Frame it as a pull, not a push. 'I want ownership of the investment decision and the outcome, which an advisory seat structurally cannot give me' is a reason that survives scrutiny.
   2. Be specific about what is structurally unavailable where you are, because 'structural' is what makes it credible. A complaint about a bad staffer sounds like a problem you carry with you; a point about the nature of the seat does not.
   3. Never disparage your current firm, your team or your clients. Interviewers assume you will one day talk about them the same way.
   4. If you are leaving after a short tenure, address it directly rather than hoping they will not ask. The EQT and Moody's versions of this question specifically probe early departures.
   5. If there was a genuine problem, a restructuring, a team that dissolved, a group being wound down, state it plainly and factually. Concrete circumstances are easy to verify and easy to accept.
   6. Close on the forward-looking reason and tie it to this specific firm, so the answer doubles as a 'why us'.

   Where candidates lose it

   Criticising your employer, however justified. It is the most reliable way to lose an interview you were winning. And being evasive about a short tenure, which invites more suspicion than the honest explanation would.

   Expect next

   • Why are you looking to switch after only six months?
   • What did you like least about it?
   • What would make you stay somewhere for ten years?

   Reported by candidates at EQT (Infrastructure, Munich, 2013); Moody's (Analytics, New York, 2018); Millennium Management (Technology, London, 2024). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.